We're all publishing soon, so what else needs to change?
For this review, I'll be looking at Alec Eulano's rough draft of Project 3 "An Unpopular Opinion Protecting Unpopular Opinions" (He has it set so an arizona.edu email is needed to view it). My comments can be found here.
An explanation of the peer review activity you selected for the project you reviewed
So I'm going to be reviewing Alec's QRG and making some copy editing suggestions in order to help him improve his piece before we publish tomorrow.
An explanation of how you think you helped the author with your feedback
I think that Alec has a decent rough draft, but don't think it has all of the necessary items to make it a true QRG. Without changing the graphics and possibly changing the voice of the QRG, it may not be seen as very effective.
An explanation of how you incorporated something from the suggested Student’s Guide readings (or any other course materials, if you’d prefer) into your feedback
I used my knowledge from my own work on my QRG along with the genre examples on D2L from student examples and in the news.
One thing about their work that you admired or think you could learn from
I think that Alec is trying to tackle an important issue, and I hope that my own work is going to seem that way as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment